Investing in Education: More Than Just Buildings – A Look at the AGILE Project
It is a popular opinion that quality education goes beyond the physical walls of a classroom. It’s more about nurturing minds, unlocking potential, and equipping generations with the tools to shape a better future. It is not just about building schools as a common practice by some political class to win cheap popularity, it’s about what happens inside them. This includes the teachers who inspire, the curriculum that empowers, and the values that guide learning to build the future and lay the foundation for the prosperity of our great nation, Nigeria. This resonates deeply with the work that I do on the Adolescent Girls Initiative for Learning and Empowerment (AGILE) project.
AGILE is a federal government project under the National Project Coordinating Unit (NPCU) of the Federal Ministry of Education (FME), supported by a loan from the World Bank. It offers a comprehensive approach to enhancing equitable access to quality education for adolescent girls by improving school infrastructure, providing conditional cash transfers to low-income households, addressing social norms that hinder girls’ attendance at school, and equipping girls with life, digital, and economic skills. The project is currently implemented across a total of 18 states: seven parent states (Borno, Ekiti, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Plateau) and eleven additional states (Adamawa, Bauchi, Gombe, Kogi, Jigawa, Kwara, Yobe, Niger, Nassarawa, Zamfara and Sokoto) under new financing.
As a Third Party Monitor (TPM) through my organisation Connected Development (CODE), commissioned by the NPCU, I have had the opportunity to independently observe AGILE’s implementation. Since 2022, my team and I have conducted monthly monitoring and quarterly verification exercises across project schools and communities in the seven parent states. We managed a team of 18 dedicated support staff, comprising civil engineers who assessed construction quality under the sub-component 1.1 (construction of new school buildings) and 1.2 (renovations of school buildings, toilets, halls, staff rooms, etc.). While the monitoring and evaluation officers track project performance, ensure accountability, and carry out Focus Group Discussions, monitor the implementation of sub-component 2.2a (life skills) and 2.2b (digital skills), and also sub-component 2.3 (Conditional Cash Transfers).
The experience has been an incredible learning curve, particularly in understanding stakeholder management and the critical importance of proper documentation, whether via emails or formal letters. Our monitoring starts with an inception meeting with NPCU to outline our plans, gather feedback, and ensure alignment on deliverables and the sample size for the project phase. Following this, we train our selected staff on data collection, probing techniques, and data confidentiality. Next, we reach out to the State Project Coordinating Units (SPCUs) in the seven states to access data and get the names of schools where each sub-component is being implemented. With this information, we calculate our sample sizes and determine the number of schools to visit per state. After doing this, the SSO goes to these communities and schools utilizing the Kobo Toolbox.
After data collection, it is then cleaned up by our expert data analyst, who ensures the data collected is accurate and analyzed per state and sub-component. This leads to a harmonized report, which provides detailed information on challenges, successes, and recommendations for each sub-component. Additionally, in instances of life-threatening issues, we immediately escalate it
to the NPCU and the World Bank via email and a Management Information System (MIS) platform that hosts reports, photos, and real-time updates on the AGILE project.
Despite the progress made on the project, I have observed some key challenges. A major gap is the limited capacity of local staff managing these projects. Many have not received adequate training, which affects their ability to manage projects effectively and deliver meaningful, high-quality results from the investments made. Another concern is the poor performance of some contractors. When school buildings are not properly built, it raises safety concerns. I often ask myself, when I have my children, would I feel safe knowing that the schools they are attending were not properly built? This is a critical issue that must be addressed. Our recommendations have consistently focused on improving construction quality and overall project delivery.
Since June 2022, CODE has conducted monthly TPM and annual verification exercises across over 2,500 AGILE project schools and communities. Moving forward, it is our collective responsibility to ensure that we have quality and safe education for children in Nigeria. For the government, the path is clear:
● The need to prioritize continuous capacity building for staff responsible for implementing government projects, ensuring that they are well-equipped with the skills to manage large-scale initiatives, enforce standards, and identify deficiencies.
● Proper vetting of contractors by experienced consultants ensures adherence to specifications while critically establishing a robust monitoring mechanism to guarantee that the work is conducted properly on the project.
● To integrate the recommendations from (CODE) TPM, as the feedbacks are not criticisms, but blueprints for improvement.
For the Nigerian people, we have a key role to play in education. Citizens need to move beyond being passive observers and choose to become active participants in demanding good governance from the government. We need to demand accountability and transparency, and start supporting initiatives that champion quality education.
The progress of Nigeria depends on all of us, not just civil society organizations. Our collective voice and commitment to quality improvement are key to making lasting change. The AGILE project has great potential to transform the lives of adolescent girls across the country. But to realize that promise, we must close capacity gaps, strengthen implementation, and take ownership of the outcomes. Remember, this project is not a grant but a loan that we would all pay back. That makes it even more important to ensure the funds are used effectively and the project is properly implemented.